In response the the Senate's ridiculous English language proposals, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez made a statement that Bush's position is that English is the common language of the country, and is important for immigrants to learn, but that "the president has never supported making English the national language".
This strikes me as a surpringly nuanced position for Bush.
As far as I am concerned, like many aspects of the immigration debate, I'm trying to figure out what problem the Senate believes this solves. This is especially the case considering that there are two amendments to the immigration bill that reference English. One "directs the government to 'preserve and enhance' the role of English" (whatever that means). And the other "calling English the 'unifying language' of the United States".
Is this just another means to "grovel at the feet of the lunatic fringe"? Methinks so.
I read online (computer problems) positive feedback on your resource. Do not even believe it, but now convinced personally. It turns out I was not deceived.
http://proeto-site.ru/znako345.php
Posted by: Advalppravy | January 13, 2010 at 04:47 PM